On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > Skipping MAP_SHARED in fork() sounds like a good idea to me...
> 
> Indeed. Linus, can you remember why we haven't done this before?

Where "this" looks something like the patch below, shamelessly
merging Nick's and Andy's patches and adding the initialization
of retval.

I suspect this may be a measurable win on database servers with
a web frontend, where the connections to the database server are
set up basically for each individual query, and don't stick around
for a long time.

No, I haven't actually tested this patch - but feel free to go
wild while I sign off for the night.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- linux-2.6.12/kernel/fork.c.mapshared        2005-08-25 18:40:44.000000000 
-0400
+++ linux-2.6.12/kernel/fork.c  2005-08-25 18:47:16.000000000 -0400
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
 {
        struct vm_area_struct * mpnt, *tmp, **pprev;
        struct rb_node **rb_link, *rb_parent;
-       int retval;
+       int retval = 0;
        unsigned long charge;
        struct mempolicy *pol;
 
@@ -265,7 +265,10 @@
                rb_parent = &tmp->vm_rb;
 
                mm->map_count++;
-               retval = copy_page_range(mm, current->mm, tmp);
+               /* Skip pte copying if page faults can take care of things. */
+               if (!file || !(tmp->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) ||
+                                               is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
+                       retval = copy_page_range(mm, current->mm, tmp);
                spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
 
                if (tmp->vm_ops && tmp->vm_ops->open)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to