On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.viz...@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 17 July 2015 at 10:04, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote:

>> I don't see Stephen's ACK on them, where is it? It's not in the
>> patch and I don't see it as response to the patches.
>
> I see it in:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1436862596-27730-4-git-send-email-tomeu.viz...@collabora.com
>
> Which was given in:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/g/559d8e36.50...@wwwdotorg.org

Hm strange I only see v1, that's why I'm confused....

> But we still need an ack for patch 1/3 before both 2/3 and 3/3 can be
> merged, because if we don't defer the probe when the pinctrl isn't
> found and just skip adding the gpio-range, there won't be no
> gpio-range set at all if the pinctrl device probes after the gpiochip
> device. Merging 2/3 now would be fine as long as we don't merge 3/3
> before 1/3.

I'll hold it back for now, bug me when you think I can merge
1/3 and 2/3.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to