On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Tang Chen wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index d312ae3..c518eb5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
> +bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> + phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> -static bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type
> *type,
> +bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> unsigned long i;
This is silly. You change that function in the first patch already, so
why don't you make it globally visible there and then have the user.
Other than that:
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
