On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 16:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > A word of caution (aka. disclaimer). This is still new. I still expect > there are some cases in the code that was missed and can cause a dead > lock or other bad side effect. Hopefully, we can iron these all out. > Also, I noticed that since the task takes it's own pi_lock for most of > the code, if something locks up and a NMI goes off, the down_trylock in > printk will also lock when it tries to take it's own pi_lock.
maybe it's time for ALL_TASKS_PI ? Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
