On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Al Viro wrote:
> It does, no (build) regressions. BTW, tree is not far from allmodconfig
> buildable on a bunch of targets now - yesterday pile of fixes was about
> half of the set needed for that. Most of the remaining stuff is for
> m68k (and applies both to Linus' tree and m68k CVS); I'll send that today
> and if Geert ACKs them, we will be _very_ close to having 2.6.13 build
They look OK to me (sorry, I'm not in a position to really test them).
For thread_info related stuff, please coordinate with Roman.
> out of the box on the following set:
> alpha, amd64, arm (RPC and versatile being tracked), i386, ia64, m32r,
> m68k (!SUN3), ppc (6xx, 44x, chestnut being tracked), ppc64, sparc,
> sparc64, s390, s390x, uml-i386, uml-amd64.
Very nice! That must be a historical record ;-)
> v850, m68knommu: gcc gives ICE on attempt to build cross-toolchain
Can't you use the plain m68k toolchain? I always used a m68k-linux-gcc 3.3.3
for my uClinux experiments.
> sun3 is seriously broken and I doubt that we'll see any takers for testing
> 2.6 on those anyway ;-)
However, a few months ago it was still known to work in m68k CVS (ask Sammy).
And I didn't see any real compile regressions since then.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
