> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 6:57 PM
> To: Manoil Claudiu-B08782
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> kernel; Shawn Guo; Wang Huan-B18965
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dts: ls1021a: Add dts nodes for eTSEC0, eTSEC1 and
> eTSEC2
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Claudiu Manoil
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This patch adds generic dts nodes for eTSEC0, eTSEC1 and eTSEC2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <[email protected]>
> >
> > Enable support for the second interrupt group register block
> > and the corresponding Rx/Tx/Err interrupt sources, for each
> > eTSEC node. DT binding documentation updates.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <[email protected]>
>
> It seems you missed to put Alison in the From field.
>
> You should also put his Signed-off-by tag just before yours.
Is this a rule invented by you? Last time I checked this was a
valid patch format. Also, this time I sent the (updated) patch,
not Alison, which should explain the "From" part. Thanks.
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
