On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 11:03 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 02:01 +0800, Scott Shu wrote: > > For MT6580 SoC platform, the secondary cores are in powered off state > > as default, so compared with MT65xx series SoC, one new enable method > > is needed. This method using the SPM (System Power Manager) inside > > the SCYSYS to control the CPU power. > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > > index ac2903d..fb80b2e 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt > > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties > > described below. > > "marvell,armada-380-smp" > > "marvell,armada-390-smp" > > "marvell,armada-xp-smp" > > + "mediatek,mt6580-smp" > > "mediatek,mt65xx-smp" > > "mediatek,mt81xx-tz-smp" > > "qcom,gcc-msm8660" > > Hi > > It seems we have 3 different kinds of cpu enable method now, and > mt65xx-smp doesn't cover all mt65xx series. So maybe it make sense to > change naming before it got merged. > > Short summary for these methods: > > mt65xx-smp: For mt65xx socs which wakeup all cores at boot. > Tested on mt6589 by Matthias. > mt6580-smp: Only first core is alive at boot, so need to wakeup > other cores using SPM. AFAIK only for mt6580 now. > mt81xx-tz-smp: For soc which wakeup all cores at boot, and have > trustzone firmware. Suitable for mt8127, mt8135.
Hi Matthias, Arnd, Any suggestion on the naming? Is it ok if I just rename mt65xx-smp to mt6589-smp since that's the only one we tested? Joe.C -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
