On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:00:38PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Add new stackvalidate ignore macros: STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_INSN and
> > STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_FUNC. These can be used to tell stackvalidate to
> > skip validation of an instruction or a function, respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/stackvalidate.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/stackvalidate.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/stackvalidate.h b/include/linux/stackvalidate.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..30d4a60
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/stackvalidate.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_STACKVALIDATE_H
> > +#define _LINUX_STACKVALIDATE_H
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This C macro tells the stack validation script to ignore the function.
> > It
> > + * should only be used in special cases where you're 100% sure it won't
> > affect
> > + * the reliability of frame pointers and kernel stack traces.
> > + *
> > + * For more information, see Documentation/stack-validation.txt.
> > + */
> > +#define STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_FUNC(_func) \
> > + void
> > __attribute__((section("__stackvalidate_ignore_func,\"ae\"#"))) \
> > + *__stackvalidate_ignore_func_##_func = _func
> > +
>
> static? Otherwise there's some risk that ignoring a static function
> will cause a duplicate symbol. Alternatively you could generate a
> more unique name.
>
> Also, should the linker script be updated to discard this section?
It validates per individual object file, so there shouldn't be a risk of
duplicate symbols. The 'e' flag in ,\"ae\"#" tells the linker to
discard the section.
(The ,\"ae\"# stuff is a horrible hack, but it's the only way I could
figure out how to set the section flags from C code. The '#' is used to
comment out gcc's default arguments to the .section directive in favor
of the "ae" flags.)
> > +#else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This asm macro tells the stack validation script to ignore the
> > instruction
> > + * immediately after the macro. It should only be used in special cases
> > where
> > + * you're 100% sure it won't affect the reliability of frame pointers and
> > + * kernel stack traces.
> > + *
> > + * For more information, see Documentation/stack-validation.txt.
> > + */
> > +.macro STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_INSN
> > + .if CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
> > + 163:
>
> Some day we should come up with a better way to do this than using a
> random three-digit number. I wonder if something like .Ltemp_\@ could
> be used for this purpose.
Agreed. And .Ltemp_\@ sounds like a good idea. I'll try it.
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
