On Wed 01-07-15 22:22:26, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:27:57AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > +#define bdi_for_each_wb(wb_cur, bdi, iter, start_blkcg_id)
> > > \
> > > + for ((iter)->next_id = (start_blkcg_id); \
> > > + ({ (wb_cur) = !(iter)->next_id++ ? &(bdi)->wb : NULL; }); )
> > > +
> >
> > This looks quite confusing. Won't it be easier to understand as:
> >
> > struct wb_iter {
> > } __attribute__ ((unused));
> >
> > #define bdi_for_each_wb(wb_cur, bdi, iter, start_blkcg_id) \
> > if (((wb_cur) = (!start_blkcg_id ? &(bdi)->wb : NULL)))
>
> But then break or continue wouldn't work as expected. It can get
> really confusing when it's wrapped by an outer loop.
That's a good point. Thanks for explanation. Maybe add a comment like:
/*
* We use use this seemingly complicated 'for' loop so that 'break' and
* 'continue' continue to work as expected.
*/
Honza
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
