Since commit: 4bf0b77158 ("sched: remove do_div() from __sched_slice()"), the logic of __sched_period() can be implemented as a single if-else without any local variable, so this patch cleans it up with an if-else statement, which expresses the function's logic straightforwardly.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 4b6e5f6..341a51f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -616,15 +616,10 @@ static inline u64 calc_delta_fair(u64 delta, struct sched_entity *se) */ static u64 __sched_period(unsigned long nr_running) { - u64 period = sysctl_sched_latency; - unsigned long nr_latency = sched_nr_latency; - - if (unlikely(nr_running > nr_latency)) { - period = sysctl_sched_min_granularity; - period *= nr_running; - } - - return period; + if (unlikely(nr_running > sched_nr_latency)) + return nr_running * sysctl_sched_min_granularity; + else + return sysctl_sched_latency; } /* -- 2.4.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/