On Fri 22-05-15 17:14:02, Tejun Heo wrote:
> __mark_inode_dirty() always dirtied the inode against the root wb
> (bdi_writeback). The previous patches added all the infrastructure
> necessary to attribute an inode against the wb of the dirtying cgroup.
>
> This patch updates __mark_inode_dirty() so that it uses the wb
> associated with the inode instead of unconditionally using the root
> one.
>
> Currently, none of the filesystems has FS_CGROUP_WRITEBACK and all
> pages will keep being dirtied against the root wb.
>
> v2: Updated for per-inode wb association.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 59d76f6..881ea5d 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,6 @@ static noinline void
> block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode)
> void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
> {
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> - struct backing_dev_info *bdi = NULL;
> int dirtytime;
>
> trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags);
> @@ -1574,30 +1573,30 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int
> flags)
> * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering).
> */
> if (!was_dirty) {
> + struct bdi_writeback *wb = inode_to_wb(inode);
> struct list_head *dirty_list;
> bool wakeup_bdi = false;
> - bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
>
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> + spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
>
> - WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
> - !test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state),
> - "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name);
> + WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) &&
> + !test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state),
> + "bdi-%s not registered\n", wb->bdi->name);
>
> inode->dirtied_when = jiffies;
> if (dirtytime)
> inode->dirtied_time_when = jiffies;
>
> if (inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES))
> - dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty;
> + dirty_list = &wb->b_dirty;
> else
> - dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty_time;
> + dirty_list = &wb->b_dirty_time;
>
> - wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, &bdi->wb,
> + wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb,
> dirty_list);
>
> - spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
> trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode);
>
> /*
> @@ -1606,8 +1605,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
> * to make sure background write-back happens
> * later.
> */
> - if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
> - wb_wakeup_delayed(&bdi->wb);
> + if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) && wakeup_bdi)
> + wb_wakeup_delayed(wb);
> return;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.4.0
>
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
