Commit-ID: 2f993cf093643b98477c421fa2b9a98dcc940323
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2f993cf093643b98477c421fa2b9a98dcc940323
Author: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 30 May 2015 22:04:25 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:38:45 +0200
perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again
While looking for other users of get_state/cond_sync. I Found
ring_buffer_attach() and it looks obviously buggy?
Don't we need to ensure that we have "synchronize" _between_
list_del() and list_add() ?
IOW. Suppose that ring_buffer_attach() preempts right_after
get_state_synchronize_rcu() and gp completes before spin_lock().
In this case cond_synchronize_rcu() does nothing and we reuse
->rb_entry without waiting for gp in between?
It also moves the ->rcu_pending check under "if (rb)", to make it
more readable imo.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: d...@stgolabs.net
Cc: der.h...@hofr.at
Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
Cc: t...@kernel.org
Fixes: b69cf53640da ("perf: Fix a race between ring_buffer_detach() and
ring_buffer_attach()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150530200425.ga15...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index eddf1ed..0ceb386 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4331,20 +4331,20 @@ static void ring_buffer_attach(struct perf_event *event,
WARN_ON_ONCE(event->rcu_pending);
old_rb = event->rb;
- event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
- event->rcu_pending = 1;
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
list_del_rcu(&event->rb_entry);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&old_rb->event_lock, flags);
- }
- if (event->rcu_pending && rb) {
- cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
- event->rcu_pending = 0;
+ event->rcu_batches = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
+ event->rcu_pending = 1;
}
if (rb) {
+ if (event->rcu_pending) {
+ cond_synchronize_rcu(event->rcu_batches);
+ event->rcu_pending = 0;
+ }
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&rb->event_lock, flags);
list_add_rcu(&event->rb_entry, &rb->event_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rb->event_lock, flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
