"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, evicted_pages); > > DEFINE_PER_CPU() needs an explicit initializer to work > around some bugs in gcc-2.95, wherein on some platforms > if you let it end up as a BSS candidate it won't end up > in the per-cpu section properly. > > I'm actually happy you made this mistake as it forced me > to audit the whole current 2.6.x tree and there are few > missing cases in there which I'll fix up and send to Linus.
I'm prety sure we fixed that somehow. But I forget how. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/