On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:43:42AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:16:26 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > > Just for the record: Using a thread for freeing the memory is curing the
> > > problem without the need to modify rcu_is_watching.
> >
> > I must confess to liking this approach better than guaranteeing full-up
> > reentrancy in call_rcu() and kfree_rcu(). ;-)
>
> Then reentrancy must be really bad if you prefer a spinning thread that
> polls constantly just to free an item ;-)
I was (perhaps naively) assuming that they would use a less aggressive
approach at some point. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
