On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Hn Chen <hn.c...@weidahitech.com> wrote: > Hi, Frans, > >> Alright, I was just wondering. Seems like a waste to be waiting for >> something that's already finished ;-). >> There's of course a risk that times may fluctuate between firmware versions. >> Did you take that into account in the code? >> Or is there a hard maximum time for these operations defined for the >> firmware? > Thanks for your reminding. > After I check with the firmware guy, I will change the value of delay. > What we do here is to read the data from flash and calculate their checksum > and > will cost about 6ms for 1024 bytes. So there is a delay for 10 ms per 1024 > bytes. > But in some situation, the controller will change it's running frequency(like > do noise immunity), > 10ms could be too margin.
Any chance this sort of thing could be detected? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
