Hi David, David Teigland wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:10:44AM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote: > >> The remove_from_waiters could only be invoked after failed to >> create_message, right? >> Since send_message always returns 0, this patch doesn't touch anything >> about the failure >> path, and it also doesn't change the original semantic. >> > > I'm not inclined to take any patches unless there's a problem identified. > > . > Do you consider take the following clean up? If yes, I will send a formal patch, otherwise pls ignore it.
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c index 35502d4..7c822f7 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c @@ -3747,30 +3747,7 @@ static int send_bast(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int mode) static int send_lookup(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb) { - struct dlm_message *ms; - struct dlm_mhandle *mh; - int to_nodeid, error; - - to_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(r); - - error = add_to_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP, to_nodeid); - if (error) - return error; - - error = create_message(r, NULL, to_nodeid, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP, &ms, &mh); - if (error) - goto fail; - - send_args(r, lkb, ms); - - error = send_message(mh, ms); - if (error) - goto fail; - return 0; - - fail: - remove_from_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY); - return error; + return send_common(r, lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP); } Thanks, Guoqing -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/