Delete unnecessary prints resulting in an "spdev could be null"
warning from a static checker in scif_peer_remove(..).

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.di...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.d...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_main.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_main.c 
b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_main.c
index f7187dc..6ce851f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_main.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_main.c
@@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ static int scif_peer_probe(struct scif_peer_dev *spdev)
        rcu_assign_pointer(scifdev->spdev, spdev);
 
        /* In the future SCIF kernel client devices will be added here */
-       dev_info(&spdev->dev, "Peer added dnode %d\n",
-                spdev->dnode);
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -109,8 +107,6 @@ static void scif_peer_remove(struct scif_peer_dev *spdev)
        mutex_lock(&scif_info.conflock);
        scif_info.total--;
        mutex_unlock(&scif_info.conflock);
-       dev_info(&spdev->dev, "Peer removed dnode %d\n",
-                spdev->dnode);
 }
 
 static void scif_qp_setup_handler(struct work_struct *work)
-- 
1.8.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to