On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:21:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > @@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ static inline int page_mapped(struct pag > * Used to decide whether a process gets delivered SIGBUS or > * just gets major/minor fault counters bumped up. > */ > -#define VM_FAULT_OOM (-1) > -#define VM_FAULT_SIGBUS 0 > -#define VM_FAULT_MINOR 1 > -#define VM_FAULT_MAJOR 2 > +#define VM_FAULT_OOM (-1) > +#define VM_FAULT_SIGBUS 0 > +#define VM_FAULT_MINOR 1 > +#define VM_FAULT_MAJOR 2 > +#define VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV 3 > > #define offset_in_page(p) ((unsigned long)(p) & ~PAGE_MASK) >
Please arrange for "success" values to be numerically larger than "failure" values. This will avoid breaking ARM. Is there a reason why we don't use -ve numbers for failure and +ve for success here? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
