On Mon 2015-06-08 16:23:24, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 01:35 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:36:44 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Add the ability to see how long it takes to sync the filesystems
> > > via the printk time mechanism.
> > >
> > > Start to standardize the printk "PM: doing something...done"
> > > messages on two separate lines.
> >
> > Well, it would be good to say what problem this is attempting to fix.
> >
> > And while I understand the underlying concern, there is a merit in keeping
> > each of these messages in one line (if everything goes well), so I'm
> > wondering
> > what about printing each of them in one go after the operation with a tail
> > depending on the result? Like
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "PM: Syncing filesystems ... done\n");
> >
> > on success or
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "PM: Syncing filesystems ... failed\n");
> >
> > on failure?
>
> Maybe.
>
> I believe there are multi-second delays possible when
> syncing the filesystems on things like usb memory sticks.
>
> I think the dmesg line count here isn't particularly important
> and there's some small value in consistently presenting timing
> information via dmesg timestamps when using 2 lines.
Hibernation is little special here, because that's what user actually
sees, and because message interleaving is extremely unlikely there.
Unless you have a real problem with this, just let it be.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
