On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 18:26 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> When numa_off is set, NUMA is turned off and node 0 is the only
> valid node on the system. The kernel skips parsing ACPI SRAT
> table in this case.
>
> Change acpi_map_pxm_to_node() to always return 0 when numa_off
> is set. Also move the range check of a proximity ID from
> acpi_get_node() to acpi_map_pxm_to_node() after the numa_off
> check. This keeps the interfaces to return 0 regardless of
> proximity ID values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> index 1333cbdc..4898082 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,15 @@ static void __acpi_map_pxm_to_node(int pxm, int node)
>
> int acpi_map_pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> {
> - int node = pxm_to_node_map[pxm];
> + int node;
> +
> + if (numa_off)
> + return 0;
I found an issue in this patch. numa_off is only defined in x86, but
this numa.c (ACPI_NUMA) can be enabled on x86 and IA64. I will fix or
drop it in the next version.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
