On 03-06-15, 17:12, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> This file depends on a Kconfig option which is a bool, so
> we use the appropriate registration function, which avoids us
> relying on an implicit inclusion of <module.h> which we are
> doing currently.
>
> While this currently works, we really don't want to be including
> the module.h header in non-modular code, which we'd be forced
> to do, pending some upcoming code relocation from init.h into
> module.h. So we fix it now by using the non-modular equivalent.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kg...@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
> ---
>
> [v2: drop exnyos part from patch, since it really was modular and
> instead needs its implicit include fixed.]
>
> drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> index b0dac7d6ba31..9e231f52150c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> @@ -659,4 +659,4 @@ static struct platform_driver s5pv210_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> },
> .probe = s5pv210_cpufreq_probe,
> };
> -module_platform_driver(s5pv210_cpufreq_platdrv);
> +builtin_platform_driver(s5pv210_cpufreq_platdrv);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
