So MPTABLE do not have problem with it, only acpi related...? YH
On 8/12/05, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:55:40PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > > I wrote: > > > > >>How so? The XAPIC version check should work there. > > > > > >ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x11] lapic_id[0x21] enabled) > > >Processor #33 15:4 APIC version 16 > > >ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x12] lapic_id[0x26] enabled) > > >Processor #38 15:4 APIC version 16 > > > > Forget it. I have fallen prey to this line: > > > > processor.mpc_apicver = 0x10; /* TBD: lapic version */ > > > > in arch/x86_64/kernel/mpparse.c. > > I am used to get correct answers from Linux :-) > > Heh. Should probably fix that. Can you file a bug with the ACPI > people on http://bugzilla.kernel.org ? (or do a patch?) > > -Andi > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
