Quoting Kevin Hilman (2015-05-28 10:32:05) > Bintian <bintian.w...@huawei.com> writes: > > > Hello Mike, > > > > On 2015/5/28 13:26, Michael Turquette wrote: > >> Quoting Bintian Wang (2015-05-23 21:11:11) > >>> Add clock drivers for hi6220 SoC, this driver controls the SoC > >>> registers to supply different clocks to different IPs in the SoC. > >>> > >>> We add one divider clock for hi6220 because the divider in hi6220 > >>> also has a mask bit but it doesnot obey the rule defined by flag > >>> "CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK", we can not get index of the mask bit by > >>> left shift fixed bits (e.g. 16 bits), so we add this divider clock > >>> to handle it. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-or...@linaro.org> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bintian Wang <bintian.w...@huawei.com> > >>> Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhu...@linaro.org> > >>> Reviewed-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei....@linaro.org> > >>> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > >>> Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.ba...@linaro.org> > >> > >> Hi Bintian, > >> > >> Thanks for making the changes requested by Stephen. I've taken his patch > >> to add assigned-clock-rate/parent support for AMBA interconnects and > >> applied it to 4.1-rc1, and then I've applied your v8 patches #4-6 on top > >> of that. You can find it at: > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next-hi6220 > > Thank you very much! > > > > I think you also need to pick patch "[PATCH v5 3/6] clk: hi6220: > > Document devicetree bindings for hi6220 clock", which described the > > dt binding of clk, and it is also acked by Stephen(v4 is the same to > > v5). > > > >> I have merged this into clk-next so it can get some cycles in > >> linux-next. > >> > >> Stephen, > >> > >> Can you send your patch out to Russell properly? It needs his ack (or > >> for him to take it outright) in order to unblock the hi6220 clock driver > >> from being merged. > > It doesn't block hi6220 clock driver now, because the UART1 is not > > enabled in hi6220 dts now. > > Now that the clk changes are queued up, can you (re)post the remaining > hikey patches with a changelog stating the dependency on the clk-next > branch. I believe what's left is just the DT and Kconfig/defconfig > changes, correct?
Just to be clear, clk-next-hi6220 is not an immutable branch. I just put it up to get some testing done on it. Depending on whether or not Russell acks Stephen's patch then it may be changed. Regards, Mike > > With some acks from the DT maintainers, these should be ready to be > merged through arm-soc. > > Thanks, > > Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
