Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capric...@gmail.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capric...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/user_namespace.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> index 4109f83..02a1197 100644
> --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
> +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new)
>       /*
>        * Verify that we can not violate the policy of which files
>        * may be accessed that is specified by the root directory,
> -      * by verifing that the root directory is at the root of the
> +      * by verifying that the root directory is at the root of the
>        * mount namespace which allows all files to be accessed.
>        */
>       if (current_chrooted())
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static ssize_t map_write(struct file *file, const char 
> __user *buf,
>        *
>        * There is a one time data dependency between reading the
>        * count of the extents and the values of the extents.  The
> -      * desired behavior is to see the values of the extents that
                   ^^^^^^^^ In american englic behavior is a correct spelling.
                            I don't know why the brits throw in extraneous 
letters.
> +      * desired behaviour is to see the values of the extents that
>        * were written before the count of the extents.
>        *
>        * To achieve this smp_wmb() is used on guarantee the write
> @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static ssize_t map_write(struct file *file, const char 
> __user *buf,
>                   (next_line != NULL))
>                       goto out;
>       }
> -     /* Be very certaint the new map actually exists */
> +     /* Be very certain the new map actually exists */
>       if (new_map.nr_extents == 0)
>               goto out;
>  
> @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static bool new_idmap_permitted(const struct file *file,
>  
>       /* Allow the specified ids if we have the appropriate capability
>        * (CAP_SETUID or CAP_SETGID) over the parent user namespace.
> -      * And the opener of the id file also had the approprpiate capability.
> +      * And the opener of the id file also had the appropriate capability.
>        */
>       if (ns_capable(ns->parent, cap_setid) &&
>           file_ns_capable(file, ns->parent, cap_setid))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to