Re: Signal handling possibly wrong

[Chris Wright]

* Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Actually that one broke a fix that I think Brodo discovered in the first
place with bogus stack frames.

Should be this one.

thanks,
-chris
---


Subject: [PATCH] fix SA_NODEFER signals to honor sa_mask

When receiving SA_NODEFER signal, kernel was inapproriately not applying
the sa_mask.  As pointed out by Brodo Stroesser.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c b/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c
@@ -577,10 +577,11 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo
        else
                ret = setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
 
-       if (ret && !(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
+       if (ret) {
                spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
                sigorsets(&current->blocked,&current->blocked,&ka->sa.sa_mask);
-               sigaddset(&current->blocked,sig);
+               if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
+                       sigaddset(&current->blocked,sig);
                recalc_sigpending();
                spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
        }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/