On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:25:37AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I've never quite understood what the '?' means.
>
> It basically means "here's a function address we found on the stack,
> which may or may not have been called." It's needed because stack
> walking isn't currently 100% reliable.
Yeah, that was not that trivial to figure out at the time:
unsigned long
print_context_stack(struct thread_info *tinfo,
...
if (__kernel_text_address(addr)) {
if ((unsigned long) stack == bp + sizeof(long)) {
ops->address(data, addr, 1);
frame = frame->next_frame;
bp = (unsigned long) frame;
} else {
ops->address(data, addr, 0);
}
and that ops->address is
print_trace_address()
|-> printk_stack_address()
So if I'm understanding this correctly, if rBP+8 is equal to rSP, i.e.
return address is on the stack, then this frame got called.
Otherwise -> "?".
I might be missing something though...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
