Em Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:30:52AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 06:10:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:46:10PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > > > if you're proposing to do something like: > > > perf script bpf_file.c > > > that will do event creation, filtering, aggregation, reporting > > > and printing results, then it's fine. > > > This is pretty much what I thought 'perf bpf run' will do.
> > Agreed, that is what I think should be done, parts of what is in > > bpf.file.c are related to the data collection, some are for filtering, > > and parts are for reporting, etc. > Looks great! :) > > This all should use infrastructure in perf for symbol resolving, > > callcahins, etc. > But then we need to stabilize libperf APIs IMHO. :) Well, all this will remain in tools/, more so in tools/perf/ where we can continue to do what you propose :-) - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
