[[PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: Modify if, else if conditions to remove unnecessary
equality checks. This change was detected with the help of coccinelle tool.] On
18/05/2015 (Mon 16:00) Dhere, Chaitanya (C.) wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Dhere <cvija...@visteon.com>
> Reply-To:
>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
> index d2e8b12..30b0135 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_softmac.c
> @@ -1364,12 +1364,11 @@ static void ieee80211_associate_complete_wq(struct
> work_struct *work)
> ieee->LinkDetectInfo.NumRecvDataInPeriod= 1;
> }
> ieee->link_change(ieee->dev);
> - if(ieee->is_silent_reset == 0){
> + if (!ieee->is_silent_reset) {
> printk("============>normal associate\n");
> notify_wx_assoc_event(ieee);
> }
In addition to Greg's comments, I'd ask while here, what about the
misleading lack of indent on the notify_wx_assoc_event() call above?
That would concern me more than trivial equality check changes that
gcc will no doubt optimize to the same thing.
> - else if(ieee->is_silent_reset == 1)
> - {
> + else if (ieee->is_silent_reset) {
But why leave the "else if" vs an "else"? You know this:
staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h: bool is_silent_reset;
and you've already tested "if (!ieee->is_silent_reset)". By
definition, a bool can have only two values and you've already
tested for one of them, so...
Paul.
--
> printk("==================>silent reset associate\n");
> ieee->is_silent_reset = false;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
