On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:04 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Should we automatically generate a module signing key at all since 
> that has the possibility of accidentally overwriting a key that the 
> builder has placed in the tree?

I prefer the other solution I suggested a few minutes ago — let
signing_key.{priv,x509} be autogenerated, and if the user wants to
provide their own then let them call it something else.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
[email protected]                              Intel Corporation

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to