* Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've recently noticed that if I suspend and resume my laptop, I can no
> longer execute turbostat. This is what I get when I try to start it:
> # turbostat
> Could not migrate to CPU 1
> turbostat: re-initialized with num_cpus 4
> Could not migrate to CPU 1
> 
> Since everything works as expected with v4.0, I ran a bisection and
> found that commit 3c18d447b3b36a8d ("sched/core: Check for available
> DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()") is the cause of the regression.
> 
> I don't know if there's something else affected by that change, but
> I can consistently reproduce the bug with turbostat.
> 
> I can provide more info if needed.

Does this commit:

  533445c6e533 sched/core: Fix regression in cpuset_cpu_inactive() for suspend

which is already in Linus's tree, and which should be part of -rc4, 
fix it? Also attached below.

Thanks,

        Ingo

====================>
>From 533445c6e53368569e50ab3fb712230c03d523f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omar Sandoval <osan...@osandov.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 03:09:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix regression in cpuset_cpu_inactive() for suspend

Commit 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in
cpuset_cpu_inactive()"), a SCHED_DEADLINE bugfix, had a logic error that
caused a regression in setting a CPU inactive during suspend. I ran into
this when a program was failing pthread_setaffinity_np() with EINVAL after
a suspend+wake up.

A simple reproducer:

        $ ./a.out
        sched_setaffinity: Success
        $ systemctl suspend
        $ ./a.out
        sched_setaffinity: Invalid argument

... where ./a.out is:

        #define _GNU_SOURCE
        #include <errno.h>
        #include <sched.h>
        #include <stdio.h>
        #include <stdlib.h>
        #include <string.h>
        #include <unistd.h>

        int main(void)
        {
                long num_cores;
                cpu_set_t cpu_set;
                int ret;

                num_cores = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
                CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set);
                CPU_SET(num_cores - 1, &cpu_set);
                errno = 0;
                ret = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(cpu_set), &cpu_set);
                perror("sched_setaffinity");
                return ret ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
        }

The mistake is that suspend is handled in the action ==
CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN case of the switch statement in
cpuset_cpu_inactive().

However, the commit in question masked out CPU_TASKS_FROZEN
from the action, making this case dead.

The fix is straightforward.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osan...@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in 
cpuset_cpu_inactive()")
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1cb5ecb3d6543c38cce5790387f336f54ec8e2bc.1430733960.git.osan...@osandov.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 34db9bf892a3..57bd333bc4ab 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6999,27 +6999,23 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block 
*nfb, unsigned long action,
        unsigned long flags;
        long cpu = (long)hcpu;
        struct dl_bw *dl_b;
+       bool overflow;
+       int cpus;
 
-       switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+       switch (action) {
        case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-               /* explicitly allow suspend */
-               if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
-                       bool overflow;
-                       int cpus;
-
-                       rcu_read_lock_sched();
-                       dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+               rcu_read_lock_sched();
+               dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
 
-                       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
-                       cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
-                       overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
-                       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+               raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
+               cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
+               overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
+               raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 
-                       rcu_read_unlock_sched();
+               rcu_read_unlock_sched();
 
-                       if (overflow)
-                               return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
-               }
+               if (overflow)
+                       return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
                cpuset_update_active_cpus(false);
                break;
        case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to