On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 20:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
[]
>> My question is how we should handle such duplicated debug print code?
>> As possible solutions, I see five options:
>> 1. Leave it as is.
>> 2. Move it to general include file (for example linux/printk.h) and
>> commonize the output to be consistent between different kdebug users.
>> 3. Add CONFIG_*_DEBUG definition for every kdebug user.
>> 4. Move everything to "#if 0" construction.
>> 5. Move everything to "#if defined(__KDEBUG)" construction.
>
> 6: delete the macros and uses
Thank you, It is indeed possible option, since in last six years there
were no attempts to "open" this code.
--
Leon Romanovsky | Independent Linux Consultant
www.leon.nu | l...@leon.nu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
