On czw, 2015-05-14 at 23:39 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> @@ -696,10 +729,18 @@ static inline void cap_emulate_setxuid(struct cred 
> *new, const struct cred *old)
>            uid_eq(old->suid, root_uid)) &&
>           (!uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid) &&
>            !uid_eq(new->euid, root_uid) &&
> -          !uid_eq(new->suid, root_uid)) &&
> -         !issecure(SECURE_KEEP_CAPS)) {
> -             cap_clear(new->cap_permitted);
> -             cap_clear(new->cap_effective);
> +          !uid_eq(new->suid, root_uid))) {
> +             if (!issecure(SECURE_KEEP_CAPS)) {
> +                     cap_clear(new->cap_permitted);
> +                     cap_clear(new->cap_effective);
> +             }
> +
> +             /*
> +              * Pre-ambient programs except setresuid to nonroot followed

I think you meant "expect". This typo changes the meaning of the
sentence.

> +              * by exec to drop capabilities.  We should make sure that
> +              * this remains the case.
> +              */
> +             cap_clear(new->cap_ambient);
>       }


-- 
Lukasz Pawelczyk


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to