"movw %ds,%cx" insn needs a 0x66 prefix, while "movw %ds,%ecx" does not.
The difference is that it overwrite entire %ecx, not only its low half,
but subsequent code doesn't depend on the value of top half of %ecx,
we can safely use the shorter insn.
The new code is also faster than old one - now we don't depend on old value
of %ecx, but this code fragment is not performance-critical.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
CC: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
CC: x...@kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index 62b4c5f..ef2651d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1195,19 +1195,19 @@ ENTRY(xen_failsafe_callback)
/*CFI_REL_OFFSET ds,DS*/
CFI_REL_OFFSET r11,8
CFI_REL_OFFSET rcx,0
- movw %ds,%cx
+ movl %ds,%ecx
cmpw %cx,0x10(%rsp)
CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
jne 1f
- movw %es,%cx
+ movl %es,%ecx
cmpw %cx,0x18(%rsp)
jne 1f
- movw %fs,%cx
+ movl %fs,%ecx
cmpw %cx,0x20(%rsp)
jne 1f
- movw %gs,%cx
+ movl %gs,%ecx
cmpw %cx,0x28(%rsp)
jne 1f
/* All segments match their saved values => Category 2 (Bad IRET). */
movq (%rsp),%rcx
CFI_RESTORE rcx
movq 8(%rsp),%r11
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
