On the hardware I have, resume latency from an alarm is often
2-3 seconds (with a fair amount of variability due to the RTC's
single second granularity). Having four seconds be the pass/fail
bar is maybe a little too tight, so extend this to 5 seconds.

Cc: Shuah Khan <shua...@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c
index 99a1ad3..13586b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/alarmtimer-suspend.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline int ksft_exit_fail(void)
 
 
 #define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000ULL
-#define UNREASONABLE_LAT (NSEC_PER_SEC * 4) /* hopefully we resume in 4secs */
+#define UNREASONABLE_LAT (NSEC_PER_SEC * 5) /* hopefully we resume in 5 secs */
 
 #define SUSPEND_SECS 15
 int alarmcount;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to