On 05/11, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Mike, Stephen,
> 
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 05:03:21PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > of_io_request_and map returns an error pointer, but the current code assumes
> > that on error the returned pointer will be NULL.
> > 
> > Obviously, that makes the check completely useless. Change the test to 
> > actually
> > check for the proper error code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
> > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> 
> There doesn't seem to be a sub-maintainer for that driver, I guess it
> should go through your tree?
> 

Yep. Applied to clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to