Hi!
> There as been a fair amount of consensus that calling
> device_suspend(...) in the reboot path was inappropriate now, because
> the device suspend code was too immature. With this latest
> piece of evidence it seems to me that introducing device_suspend(...)
> in kernel_power_off, kernel_halt, kernel_reboot, or kernel_kexec
> can never be appropriate.
Code is not ready now => it can never be fixed? Thats quite a strange
conclusion to make.
Pavel
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
