On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:32:02AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:13:16PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > The thing you want to avoid is having two processes both
> > runnable at once
> 
> Right, because as soon as nr_running > 1 we kill the entire nohz_full
> thing. RT or not for ksoftirqd doesn't matter.
> 
> Then again, like interrupts, you basically want to avoid softirqs in
> this mode.
> 
> So I think the right solution is to figure out why the softirqs get
> raised and cure that.

Makes sense, but it also makes sense to have something that detects
when that cure fails and clean up.  And, in a test/debug environment,
also issuing some sort of diagnostic in that case.

                                                        Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to