On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Dave Chinner <da...@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> ...Please explain what your use case is that makes this > so prohibitively expensive it needs to be removed. wake on packet, process packet without turning on the display, immediately suspend. Do this potentially several times per second. >> The user-space utilities s2ram and s2disk choose to invoke sync() today. >> A user can invoke suspend directly via /sys/power/state to skip that cost. > > So, you want to have s2disk write all the dirty pages in memory to > the suspend image, rather than to the filesystem? The s2disk utility is unchanged by this proposal, it already includes a sync(). cheers, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
