Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > > + * @capabilities: > > + * Specifies what operations are provided by the algorithm > > + * implementation. > > Don't do this. It's a nightmare for the user to have to deal with > multiple implementations with differing capabilities. > > Make the implementor provide backups/fallbacks.
What if the fallback doesn't exist? For instance, a H/W contained key is specifically limited to, say, just sign/verify and the not permitted to be used for encrypt/decrypt. How do you provide a fallback given you can't get at the key? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
