On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:28:58PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Nicolas Schichan <nschic...@freebox.fr> > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 15:00:13 +0200 > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschic...@freebox.fr> > > --- > > > > This patch was first sent as part of a serie modifying the core > > seccomp code to allow the use of the classic BPF JIT. As the core > > changes have been submitted to netdev by Daniel Borkmann, it is now > > time to re-submit this patch separately. > > > > While not physically dependent of the core seccomp changes they are > > needed for the code added in this patch to be triggered. > > Where would you like this to be applied, my tree? > > This is an ongoing situation, where people have traditionally not > consistently wanted bpf JIT patches to go into the networking tree. > > So I beg everyone posting such things to netdev to be _clear_ > and _explicit_ about whether you expect me to integrate the patch > or not.
I think you have taken previous ARM net JIT patches, so I think it makes sense if you continue to do so. I'm not knowledgable of the JIT interface myself, all I can say about many of these patches is that they look okay to me on a superficial basis. I suspect you're doing more or less the same, but from a slightly different perspective (presumably through not knowing ARM assembly.) -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
