Consider "(u64)insn1.imm << 32 | imm" in the arm64 JIT. Since imm is
signed 32-bit, it is sign-extended to 64-bit, losing the high 32 bits.
The fix is to convert imm to u32 first and zero-extend it to u64.
Also extend test_bpf to catch this JIT bug; the interpreter is correct.
Before:
test_bpf: #58 load 64-bit immediate ret -1 != 1 FAIL (1 times)
After:
test_bpf: #58 load 64-bit immediate 74 PASS
Fixes: 30d3d94cc3d5 ("arm64: bpf: add 'load 64-bit immediate' instruction")
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim....@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.w...@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
lib/test_bpf.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index edba042b2325..14cdc099fda0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
return -EINVAL;
}
- imm64 = (u64)insn1.imm << 32 | imm;
+ imm64 = ((u64)(u32)insn1.imm) << 32 | (u64)(u32)imm;
emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx);
return 1;
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index 80d78c51f65f..9f6849891b5f 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -1755,7 +1755,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R3, 0x1234, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(R0, 0x1ffffffffLL),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, R0, 32), /* R0 = 1 */
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
INTERNAL,
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
