On Wed, 6 May 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 5 May 2015 at 21:31, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/posix-timers.h b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> > > index 907f3fd..35786c5 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> > > @@ -98,9 +98,13 @@ struct k_itimer {
> > >
> > > struct k_clock {
> > > int (*clock_getres) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec
> > *tp);
> > > + int (*clock_getres64) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct
> > timespec64 *tp);
> > > int (*clock_set) (const clockid_t which_clock,
> > > const struct timespec *tp);
> > > + int (*clock_set64) (const clockid_t which_clock,
> > > + const struct timespec64 *tp);
> > > int (*clock_get) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec *
> > tp);
> > > + int (*clock_get64) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec64
> > *tp);
> > > int (*clock_adj) (const clockid_t which_clock, struct timex *tx);
> > > int (*timer_create) (struct k_itimer *timer);
> > > int (*nsleep) (const clockid_t which_clock, int flags,
> > > @@ -109,10 +113,15 @@ struct k_clock {
> > > int (*timer_set) (struct k_itimer * timr, int flags,
> > > struct itimerspec * new_setting,
> > > struct itimerspec * old_setting);
> > > + int (*timer_set64) (struct k_itimer *timr, int flags,
> > > + struct itimerspec64 *new_setting,
> > > + struct itimerspec64 *old_setting);
> > > int (*timer_del) (struct k_itimer * timr);
> > > #define TIMER_RETRY 1
> > > void (*timer_get) (struct k_itimer * timr,
> > > struct itimerspec * cur_setting);
> > > + void (*timer_get64) (struct k_itimer *timr,
> > > + struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting);
> >
> > I asked you last time to provide a conversion for a single instance
> > first and I gave you even step by step instructions.
> >
> > But you insist on resending the whole mess in one go. Try again.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > tglx
> >
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for your comments. I think i have followed your instructions
> to convert the syscall functions in patch 5 and patch 6.
>
> And i have confusions about the "a single instance first", could you
> explain that in detail? Thanks a lot.
Single function, single syscall. Not a wholesale conversion of the
world and some more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
