On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:23:26PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I probably should have added that the microbenchmark specifically tests > for an atomic 5-byte NOP (as required by tracepoints etc.) If the > requirement for 5-byte atomic is dropped there might be faster > combinations, e.g. 66 66 66 90 might work better on some platforms, or > using very long 0F 1F sequences.
Right, so I was thinking of extending it for all sizes 1 - 15 and then run it on boxes. I'll keep you posted. Thanks for the toy - now I get to have some fun. :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/