On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:02:50 +0100 Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> writes: > > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:18:46 +0100 > > Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> The only caller to this function (__print_array) was getting it wrong by > >> passing the array length instead of buffer length. As the element size > >> was already being passed for other reasons it seems reasonable to push > >> the calculation of buffer length into the function. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > > > > Thanks, I'll add a stable tag to this too, and get it out soon. > > I take it you'll pick up Dave's reviewed-by? Yep, I will. > > As for CC'ing stable I wouldn't worry too much as nothing in the kernel > uses __print_array yet (unless you count the example). But it is a > fairly trivial patch so if you as the maintainer is happy I'm happy ;-) OK, if it's not used, then I'll just add it to this release. Thanks, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
