On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:13:37AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:11:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So I think it would be much easier to just make the change in > > "pci_bus_alloc_resource()", and say that if the parent resource that we're > > testing starts at some non-zero value, we just use that instead of "min" > > when we call down to allocate_resource(). That gets it for MEM resources > > too. > > Cool! I think it's the way to go. > > > Something like the following (also _totally_ untested, but even simpler > > than yours). It basically says: if the parent resource starts at non-zero, > > we use that as the starting point for allocations, otherwise the passed-in > > value. > > Tested on alpha. Initially I was concerned a bit about architectures > where resources _never_ start at zero (due to some specific bus to > resource conversions), but this change is just a no-op for them. > > > That, together with changing PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x2000 (or even 0x4000) > > might be the ticket... > > Definitely 0x4000. Then we can get rid of PCIBIOS_MIN_CARDBUS_IO which > was introduced exactly for this reason, I guess.
Nice, care to make up a single patch with these two changes in it? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
