On 04/24/2015 06:29 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:15:54PM +0000, Liran Liss wrote: >>> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma- > >>> +static inline int rdma_tech_iboe(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num) >>> +{ >>> + return device->query_transport(device, port_num) >>> + == RDMA_TRANSPORT_IBOE; >> >> Remove RDMA_TRANSPORT_IBOE. >> In the current code, the test should be: (IB transport && Ethernet link >> layer). > > No, if this rmda_tech stuff is to reflect the specification the port > implements, then RoCEE is a valid specification (IBA Annex A16), as it > RoCEEv2 (A17). > > This patch set is trying to drop then link layer concept entirely.
I think a new enum on protocol could help solve the conflict in here, we can still get rid of the link layer meanwhile leave the legacy transport type alone :-) Regards, Michael Wang > > Jason > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
