Hi, Josh - On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:40:02AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > [...] > Frank, did you rebase this against some newer tree or something?
Yes; the lib/Kconfig.debug part didn't apply to current git. > Curious why you sent it again. At least as a patch-ping; the poor-debuginfo problems are reported to affect non-fedora users too. > > +ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_VTA > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fvar-tracking-assignments) > > +else > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-var-tracking-assignments) > > +endif > > + > > Is there a reason you moved this hunk under the DWARF4 options instead > of modifying it in-place like the original patch did? Yes, this version appears a little safer, in the sense that without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, neither setting of CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_VTA would affect the CFLAGS. (In fact, Jakub advises the positive polarity -fvar-tracking-assignments is redundant with -g, and the negative polarity one only provides codegen-bug-protection in the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO case.) - FChE -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
