On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:10:40 +0800 Gavin Guo <gavin....@canonical.com> wrote:
> >> for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++) {
> >> if (!kmalloc_caches[i]) {
> >> - kmalloc_caches[i] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL,
> >> + kmalloc_caches[i] = create_kmalloc_cache(
> >> + kmalloc_names[i],
> >> 1 << i, flags);
> >> }
> >
> > You could do something like
> >
> > kmalloc_caches[i] = create_kmalloc_cache(
> > kmalloc_names[i],
> > kstrtoul(kmalloc_names[i] + 8),
> > flags);
> >
> > here, and remove those weird "96" and "192" cases.
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure if I am following your idea. Would you
> mean to simply replace the string like:
>
> kmalloc_caches[1] = create_kmalloc_cache(
> kmalloc_names[1], 96, flags);
> as follows:
>
> kmalloc_caches[1] = create_kmalloc_cache(
> kmalloc_names[1],
> kstrtoul(kmalloc_names[i] + 8),
> flags);
>
> or if you like to merge the last 2 if conditions for 96 and 192 cases to
> the first if condition check:
>
> if (!kmalloc_caches[i]) {
> kmalloc_caches[i] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL,
> 1 << i, flags);
> }
The latter - initialize all the caches in a single loop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
