On 04/20/2015 04:23 PM, Jason Low wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 22:03 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:diff --git a/include/linux/osq_lock.h b/include/linux/osq_lock.h index 3a6490e..703ea5c 100644 --- a/include/linux/osq_lock.h +++ b/include/linux/osq_lock.h @@ -32,4 +32,9 @@ static inline void osq_lock_init(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) extern bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock); extern void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock); +static inline bool osq_is_locked(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) +{ + return atomic_read(&lock->tail) != OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL; +}Would it be better to separate the addition of osq_is_locked() into its own patch, since this can be useful for other situations and isn't just specific to the rwsem optimization.
I think the osq_lock.h change is too simple and straight forward to warrant a separate patch.
Cheers, Longman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
