Hi Masami,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 08:42:00PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> @@ -2760,14 +2762,17 @@ int del_perf_probe_events(struct strlist *dellist)
>
> pr_debug("Group: %s, Event: %s\n", group, event);
>
> + ret = ret2 = -ENOENT;
> if (namelist)
> ret = del_trace_probe_event(kfd, buf, namelist);
>
> - if (unamelist && ret != 0)
> - ret = del_trace_probe_event(ufd, buf, unamelist);
> + if (unamelist)
> + ret2 = del_trace_probe_event(ufd, buf, unamelist);
>
> - if (ret != 0)
> - pr_info("Info: Event \"%s\" does not exist.\n", buf);
> + /* Since we can remove probes which already removed, no error
> */
> + if (ret != 0 && ret2 != 0)
> + pr_debug("Event \"%s\" does not exist.\n", buf);
I think it'd be better checking 'ret == -ENOENT && ret2 == -ENOENT'
here since del_trace_probe_event() can return other error codes.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + ret = 0;
>
> free(str);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
